Perspective-based Usability Inspection: An Empirical Validation of E cacy
نویسندگان
چکیده
Inspection is a fundamental means of achieving software usability. Past research showed that the current usability inspection techniques were rather ine ective. We developed perspective-based usability inspection, which divides the large variety of usability issues along di erent perspectives and focuses each inspection session on one perspective. We conducted a controlled experiment to study its e ectiveness, using a posttest only control group experimental design, with 24 professionals as subjects. The control group used heuristic evaluation, which is the most popular technique for usability inspection. The experimental design and the results are presented, which show that inspectors applying perspective-based inspection not only found more usability problems related to their assigned perspectives, but also found more overall problems. Perspective-based inspection was shown to be more e ective for the aggregated results of multiple inspectors, nding about 30% more usability problems for 3 inspectors. A management implication of this study is that assigning inspectors more speci c responsibilities leads to higher performance. Internal and external threats to validity are discussed to help better interpret the results and to guide future empirical studies. 1 Usability Inspection Techniques Usability inspection [14] is an important approach to achieving usability. It asks human inspectors to detect usability problems in a user interface design so that they can be corrected to improve usability. It usually requires multiple inspectors, who can either work individually or as a team. Usability inspection di ers from user-based evaluation methods such as usability testing [6] or evaluation in participatory design [24]. In user-based methods usability problems are found through the observation of and interaction with users while they use or comment on an interface. In usability inspection, problems are found through the expertise of the inspectors and the inspection technique they use. Di erent usability inspection techniques have been practiced, including heuristic evaluation, cognitive walkthrough, and formal usability inspection, etc. [20]. Empirical studies [5] [8] [11] showed that when using these techniques the percentage of usability problems detected by each inspector was rather low.
منابع مشابه
An Empirical Study of Perspective-based Usability Inspection
Inspection is a fundamental means of achieving software usability. Past research showed that during usability inspection the success rate (percentage of problems detected) of each individual inspector was rather low. We developed perspective-based usability inspection, which divides the large variety of usability issues along di erent perspectives and focuses each inspection session on one pers...
متن کاملOn the Advantages of a Systematic Inspection for Evaluating Hypermedia Usability
It is indubitable that usability inspection of complex hypermedia is still an "art", in the sense that a great deal is left to the skills, experience, and ability of the inspectors. Training inspectors is difficult and often quite expensive. The SUE inspection technique has been proposed to help usability inspectors share and transfer their evaluation know-how, to simplify the hypermedia inspec...
متن کاملUsability Inspection in Model-Driven Web Development: Empirical Validation in WebML
There is a lack of empirically validated usability evaluation methods that can be applied to models in model-driven Web development. Evaluation of these models allows an early detection of usability problems perceived by the end-user. This motivated us to propose WUEP, a usability inspection method which can be integrated into different model-driven Web development processes. We previously demo...
متن کاملeLSE Methodology: a Systematic Approach to the e-Learning Systems Evaluation
Quality of e-learning systems is one of the important topics that the researchers are investigating in the last years. This paper refines the concept of quality of e-learning systems and proposes a new framework, called TICS (Technology, Interaction, Content, Services), which focuses on the most important aspects to be considered when designing or evaluating an e-learning system. Our proposal e...
متن کاملGuiding Usability Evaluators During Hypermedia Inspection
This paper presents an empirical validation of the Abstract Tasks (ATs), which are operational guidelines driving the inspection activities during a usability evaluation. Two groups of inspectors evaluated a multimedia CD-ROM, one group using the ATs, the other group using a list of heuristics. Results demonstrated a better performance of the AT group but raised some issues concerning the accep...
متن کامل